This HTML5 document contains 321 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Namespace Prefixes

PrefixIRI
dchttp://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
n10http://pubannotation.org/docs/sourcedb/PMC/sourceid/
n2http://purl.jp/bio/10/colil/id/
rdfshttp://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#
bibohttp://purl.org/ontology/bibo/
n4http://purl.jp/bio/10/colil/ontology/201303#
rdfhttp://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
n11http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/
n9http://togows.dbcls.jp/entry/pubmed/
n6http://dx.doi.org/
xsdhhttp://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#
n8http://purl.org/spar/doco/

Statements

Subject Item
n2:23950876
rdf:type
n4:ReferencePaper n4:CitationPaper n4:RelevantPaper
rdfs:seeAlso
n6:10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068784 n9:23950876 n10:0 n11:0
bibo:cites
n2:14559999 n2:7512791 n2:20610543 n2:15956778 n2:8986779 n2:20832013 n2:18799330 n2:18602742 n2:9185705 n2:17320820 n2:15833875 n2:16464571 n2:17259558 n2:16822724 n2:10051570 n2:18922904 n2:16721365 n2:19754359 n2:19034632 n2:16551847 n2:12019176 n2:12600231 n2:18381457 n2:18006757 n2:12878745 n2:17349528
n4:cocitationWith
n2:23118055 n2:17463250 n2:11494131 n2:23777562 n2:19838209 n2:16377102 n2:16996205 n2:21129859 n2:24027196 n2:11747348 n2:19897418 n2:17047074 n2:16300820 n2:24186206 n2:17634559 n2:22452803 n2:23321494 n2:8264238 n2:25800395 n2:19754359 n2:22843870 n2:18949375 n2:19615770 n2:15613453 n2:22108822 n2:25275598 n2:21668040 n2:15665856 n2:22337149 n2:11782378
n4:hasRelevantBibliographicResourceOf
_:vb530059236 _:vb530059237 _:vb530059238 _:vb530059232 _:vb530059233 _:vb530059234 _:vb530059235 _:vb530059212 _:vb530059213 _:vb530059214 _:vb530059215 _:vb530059209 _:vb530059210 _:vb530059211 _:vb530059228 _:vb530059229 _:vb530059230 _:vb530059231 _:vb530059224 _:vb530059225 _:vb530059226 _:vb530059227 _:vb530059220 _:vb530059221 _:vb530059222 _:vb530059223 _:vb530059216 _:vb530059217 _:vb530059218 _:vb530059219
n4:pmcid
PMC0
bibo:doi
10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0068784
n8:contains
_:vb24477695 _:vb24477680 _:vb24477707 _:vb24477700
Subject Item
_:vb24477680
rdf:type
n8:Section
dc:title
introduction
n8:contains
_:vb24477684 _:vb24477685 _:vb24477686 _:vb24477687 _:vb24477681 _:vb24477682 _:vb24477683 _:vb24477692 _:vb24477693 _:vb24477694 _:vb24477688 _:vb24477689 _:vb24477690 _:vb24477691
Subject Item
_:vb24477681
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Prostate cancer (PC) is the most common malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths among male patients [>>1<<]. During cancer progression, the initial growth of PC cells is androgen-dependent, and these cells undergo apoptosis upon androgen depletion.
n4:mentions
n2:20610543
Subject Item
_:vb24477682
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
As a consequence, androgen ablation was considered the standard treatment for PC for over 50 years [>>2<<]. Many patients eventually developed a hormone-refractory disease due to the growth of androgen-refractory cancer cells, which leads to failure of androgen ablation therapy and leaves patients with fewer therapeutic options [3], [4].
n4:mentions
n2:7512791
Subject Item
_:vb24477683
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Many patients eventually developed a hormone-refractory disease due to the growth of androgen-refractory cancer cells, which leads to failure of androgen ablation therapy and leaves patients with fewer therapeutic options [>>3<<], [4]. Combination of definitive local therapies, such as radical prostatectomy together with adjuvant radiotherapy, has been demonstrated to improve the survival of PC patients [5], [6]. However, such therapy is challenged by the
n4:mentions
n2:16551847
Subject Item
_:vb24477684
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Many patients eventually developed a hormone-refractory disease due to the growth of androgen-refractory cancer cells, which leads to failure of androgen ablation therapy and leaves patients with fewer therapeutic options [3], [>>4<<]. Combination of definitive local therapies, such as radical prostatectomy together with adjuvant radiotherapy, has been demonstrated to improve the survival of PC patients [5], [6]. However, such therapy is challenged by the emergence of
n4:mentions
n2:12878745
Subject Item
_:vb24477685
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Combination of definitive local therapies, such as radical prostatectomy together with adjuvant radiotherapy, has been demonstrated to improve the survival of PC patients [>>5<<], [6]. However, such therapy is challenged by the emergence of resistance in tumor cells. It is, therefore, of paramount importance to develop novel therapeutic strategies to overcome radioresistance and improve radio-sensitivity by
n4:mentions
n2:18602742
Subject Item
_:vb24477686
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
play critical roles in cancer development and progression through the regulation on cell proliferation, apoptosis, anchorage-independent growth, invasion, angiogenesis, cancer immunity and resistance to chemo- and/or radiotherapy [>>7<<]. These two receptors are frequently overexpressed in a variety of human cancers including PC [8], [9], [10], and therefore could be used as candidates for targeted cancer therapy.
n4:mentions
n2:19754359
Subject Item
_:vb24477687
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
These two receptors are frequently overexpressed in a variety of human cancers including PC [>>8<<], [9], [10], and therefore could be used as candidates for targeted cancer therapy.
n4:mentions
n2:18006757
Subject Item
_:vb24477688
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
These two receptors are frequently overexpressed in a variety of human cancers including PC [8], [>>9<<], [10], and therefore could be used as candidates for targeted cancer therapy.
n4:mentions
n2:17349528
Subject Item
_:vb24477689
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
These two receptors are frequently overexpressed in a variety of human cancers including PC [8], [9], [>>10<<], and therefore could be used as candidates for targeted cancer therapy.
n4:mentions
n2:12019176
Subject Item
_:vb24477690
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
treatment of different human cancers, As expected however, the development of de novo resistance has been observed in clinic after long-term use of these medicines, suggesting the existence of bypass mechanisms within tumor cells [>>11<<]. Mechanistic studies on the cellular and molecular events revealed that extensive crosstalk between EGFR and IGF1R signaling occurs at multiple levels, and that blockage of EGFR signaling leads to enhanced responses to the IGF1R ligand,
n4:mentions
n2:17259558
Subject Item
_:vb24477691
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
studies on the cellular and molecular events revealed that extensive crosstalk between EGFR and IGF1R signaling occurs at multiple levels, and that blockage of EGFR signaling leads to enhanced responses to the IGF1R ligand, IGF [>>12<<], [13]. These data imply that targeting both receptors at the same time could provide better efficacy in cancer treatment and overcome tumor resistance to an individual inhibitor, while improving the sensitivity of individual inhibitors to
n4:mentions
n2:19034632
Subject Item
_:vb24477692
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
studies on the cellular and molecular events revealed that extensive crosstalk between EGFR and IGF1R signaling occurs at multiple levels, and that blockage of EGFR signaling leads to enhanced responses to the IGF1R ligand, IGF [12], [>>13<<]. These data imply that targeting both receptors at the same time could provide better efficacy in cancer treatment and overcome tumor resistance to an individual inhibitor, while improving the sensitivity of individual inhibitors to
n4:mentions
n2:9185705
Subject Item
_:vb24477693
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Consistently, studies have shown that dual targeting of both receptors blocks their reciprocal hyperphosphorylation, inhibits the proliferation and induces apoptosis in multiple cancer cells including PC and colorectal cancer [>>14<<], [15].
n4:mentions
n2:18922904
Subject Item
_:vb24477694
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Consistently, studies have shown that dual targeting of both receptors blocks their reciprocal hyperphosphorylation, inhibits the proliferation and induces apoptosis in multiple cancer cells including PC and colorectal cancer [14], [>>15<<].
n4:mentions
n2:17320820
Subject Item
_:vb24477695
rdf:type
n8:Section
dc:title
materials and methods
n8:contains
_:vb24477696 _:vb24477697 _:vb24477698 _:vb24477699
Subject Item
_:vb24477696
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Cells were irradiated as described by Liu et al [>>16<<]. In some experiments, the cells were also transfected with IRS1 or non-silencing control (NSC) siRNAs (50 nM, Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) according to manufacturer's protocol.
n4:mentions
n2:18799330
Subject Item
_:vb24477697
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
To detect apoptotic rate in treated cells, the cells were stained with Annexin V and PI, and then subjected to flow cytometry as described [>>16<<]. The Annexin V-positive and PI-negative cells undergoing early apoptosis were counted as apoptotic cells. All experiments were conducted in duplicates and data shown are representative of three independent experiments.
n4:mentions
n2:18799330
Subject Item
_:vb24477698
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Immunoprecipitation and Western-blot assay were performed as described by Liu et al [>>17<<]. The following antibodies were from Cell Signaling:
n4:mentions
n2:15833875
Subject Item
_:vb24477699
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
The quantitative in vitro homologous recombination (HR) assay was performed using the pDR-GFP recombination reporter system [>>19<<]. Briefly, the pDR-GFP plasmid expressing two nonfunctional GFP genes was stably transfected into DU145 cells.
n4:mentions
n2:10051570
Subject Item
_:vb24477700
rdf:type
n8:Section
dc:title
results
n8:contains
_:vb24477701 _:vb24477702 _:vb24477703 _:vb24477704 _:vb24477705 _:vb24477706
Subject Item
_:vb24477701
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
For this purpose, we used ARCaPM, the mesenchymal counterpart of ARCaPE developed by Graham et al [>>21<<]. Both cells lines exhibit minimal expression of androgen receptor [22]. Consistent with previous findings by Buck et al [14], combined treatment with EGFR and IGF1R inhibitors could not synergistically inhibit mesenchymal cell growth in
n4:mentions
n2:18381457
Subject Item
_:vb24477702
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Both cells lines exhibit minimal expression of androgen receptor [>>22<<]. Consistent with previous findings by Buck et al [14], combined treatment with EGFR and IGF1R inhibitors could not synergistically inhibit mesenchymal cell growth in response to irradiation, as it did for epithelial growth (Figure 1A).
n4:mentions
n2:8986779
Subject Item
_:vb24477703
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Consistent with previous findings by Buck et al [>>14<<], combined treatment with EGFR and IGF1R inhibitors could not synergistically inhibit mesenchymal cell growth in response to irradiation, as it did for epithelial growth (Figure 1A).
n4:mentions
n2:18922904
Subject Item
_:vb24477704
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
For this analysis, the nuclear extract from R503 cells was used as the positive control, as demonstrated by Yang et al [>>23<<]. In addition, expression of NHEJ-related DNA repair proteins, including DNA-PK, Ku70, Ku80 and XRCC4, were not affected by AG1024, Erlotinib or both in DU145 cells (Figure 2E), suggesting that inhibition of these two signaling pathways
n4:mentions
n2:15956778
Subject Item
_:vb24477705
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Previous studies revealed extensive crosstalk between EGFR and IGF1R signaling pathway at multiple levels [>>14<<]. Our data above have demonstrated that co-inhibition of EGFR and IGF1R could additively radio-sensitize PC cells through the impairment of HRR DSB repair.
n4:mentions
n2:18922904
Subject Item
_:vb24477706
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Our current data on AG1024 and Erlotinib regulating IRS1 phosphorylation/activation implicated the potential involvement of IRS1/Rad51-mediated HRR in response to γ irradiation in PC cells, as previous study also indicated [>>24<<]. Indeed, our data showed that IRS1 phosphorylation was induced by γ-irradiation with peak activation achieved at 4 h after γ-irradiation in DU145 and PC3 cells, while the peak of IRS1 phosphorylation was delayed to 8 h after γ-irradiation
n4:mentions
n2:14559999
Subject Item
_:vb24477707
rdf:type
n8:Section
dc:title
discussion
n8:contains
_:vb24477708 _:vb24477709 _:vb24477710 _:vb24477711 _:vb24477712 _:vb24477713 _:vb24477714
Subject Item
_:vb24477708
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Without proper DNA repair capacity, cells undergo apoptosis, mitotic catastrophe, autophagy, cellular senescence, or even carcinogensis [>>25<<]. However, in tumor cells after radiation therapy, enhanced DNA repair capacity such as HRR or NHEJ leads to resistance to radiotherapy. HRR is a template-driven and thus error-free DNA repair mechanism that involves many proteins
n4:mentions
n2:20832013
Subject Item
_:vb24477709
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
NHEJ is a more error-prone mechanism that operates with DNA repair proteins such as Ku70/80, XRCC4, XRCC1, DNA-PK, and XLF [>>25<<]. In the current study, we showed that inhibition of both EGFR and IGF1R was able to suppress HRR repair of damaged DNA after γ-irradiation, but not NHEJ repair. This explains why the combination of these two inhibitors could
n4:mentions
n2:20832013
Subject Item
_:vb24477710
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
This explains why the combination of these two inhibitors could synergistically inhibit HRR, but only showing additive effect on DSB repair inhibition, consistent with previous studies that NHEJ is the main mechanism of DSB repair [>>26<<].
n4:mentions
n2:16822724
Subject Item
_:vb24477711
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Both signaling pathways including the downstream signaling cascades are activated in response to ionizing radiation [>>27<<]. Upon their activation, the PI3K-AKT and Ras-MAPK pathways present specific activity toward resistance to chemo- and radio-therapy, in addition to their regulatory capability on cell viability, apoptosis and cell proliferation [28], [29]:
n4:mentions
n2:12600231
Subject Item
_:vb24477712
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Upon their activation, the PI3K-AKT and Ras-MAPK pathways present specific activity toward resistance to chemo- and radio-therapy, in addition to their regulatory capability on cell viability, apoptosis and cell proliferation [>>28<<], [29]: The Ras-MAPK pathway stimulates production of EGFR ligand and in turn activates EGFR in an autocrine manner, while PI3K-AKT pathway directly activates the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK, the essential component for NHEJ machinery. The
n4:mentions
n2:16464571
Subject Item
_:vb24477713
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
Upon their activation, the PI3K-AKT and Ras-MAPK pathways present specific activity toward resistance to chemo- and radio-therapy, in addition to their regulatory capability on cell viability, apoptosis and cell proliferation [28], [>>29<<]: The Ras-MAPK pathway stimulates production of EGFR ligand and in turn activates EGFR in an autocrine manner, while PI3K-AKT pathway directly activates the catalytic subunit of DNA-PK, the essential component for NHEJ machinery.
n4:mentions
n2:16721365
Subject Item
_:vb24477714
rdf:type
n4:Context
rdf:value
However, in IGF1R pathway, Trojanek et al. demonstrated that upon IGF-I stimulation, IRS1, the major IGF1R substrate, binds with Rad51, stimulates nuclear localization of the latter to the site of damaged DNA, and promotes HRR [>>24<<].
n4:mentions
n2:14559999
Subject Item
_:vb530059209
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
5
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:19754359
Subject Item
_:vb530059210
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
3
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:17047074
Subject Item
_:vb530059211
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
3
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:23777562
Subject Item
_:vb530059212
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
3
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:25275598
Subject Item
_:vb530059213
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:19838209
Subject Item
_:vb530059214
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:15665856
Subject Item
_:vb530059215
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:8264238
Subject Item
_:vb530059216
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:17634559
Subject Item
_:vb530059217
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:22108822
Subject Item
_:vb530059218
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:22337149
Subject Item
_:vb530059219
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:11747348
Subject Item
_:vb530059220
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:22452803
Subject Item
_:vb530059221
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:17463250
Subject Item
_:vb530059222
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:24027196
Subject Item
_:vb530059223
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:16300820
Subject Item
_:vb530059224
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:16996205
Subject Item
_:vb530059225
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:19897418
Subject Item
_:vb530059226
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:25800395
Subject Item
_:vb530059227
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:24186206
Subject Item
_:vb530059228
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:11494131
Subject Item
_:vb530059229
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:23118055
Subject Item
_:vb530059230
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:11782378
Subject Item
_:vb530059231
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:23321494
Subject Item
_:vb530059232
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:22843870
Subject Item
_:vb530059233
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:15613453
Subject Item
_:vb530059234
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:18949375
Subject Item
_:vb530059235
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:19615770
Subject Item
_:vb530059236
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:21129859
Subject Item
_:vb530059237
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:16377102
Subject Item
_:vb530059238
rdf:type
n4:RelevantBibliographicResource
n4:RelevantScore
2
n4:hasRelevantPaperId
n2:21668040